Week 8 - Activism

Until doing this paper, I hadn’t really given much thought into the origins of our education system in Aotearoa. I suppose I just accepted it for what it was. In the last module I reflected on the colonisation of Māori and how there was an expectation by the Crown and British settlers that they would assimilate into European ways, because that was the ‘best’ way to do things. Settlers who came to Aotearoa had been heavily interpellated into a class system and wanted that system to be replicated in their new colony, including the education system. 


Our current education system is modelled on a traditional western society, it perpetuates the concept that there is a required and desired ‘normality’. Schools reproduce “a set of universals that articulate and normalise one way of being” (Ball & Collet-Sabé, 2021, p. 6). That ‘way of being’ allows the government and wider society to retain power and control through pushing their own agendas in classrooms. While critical thinking is one of the values listed in the New Zealand Curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2007), critical thinkers are not exactly conducive to the power structure of society. Everyday practices within schools and classrooms interpellate tamariki over time without it seeming like massive indoctrination in one go. As Backer (2018) puts it, “interpellations are therefore small moments with big meanings” (p. 5).


It is hard to be sitting within the education system and see genuine possibilities for change when the mountain seems to be so big. Simply modifying what we currently have will not be sufficient. That is not transformative, not a true counterinterpellation. However, if we as educators and change makers do start to counter-act or counterinterpellate those small moments with big meanings then the transformation begins. While small moments of activism seem like just a drop in the bucket, it is these small moments that can change the tide. 


I remember when National Standards were introduced and I was asked to tell whānau that after six months at school their tamariki were 'below' expectation. I outright refused and instead talked to whānau about the progress those ākonga had made since they started school, recognising that they were all individuals who were developing and learning at different rates having started at different stages. Until now I hadn't thought of this as activism but can now see this was a process of interpellation that I was rebelling against. The government was telling kaiako that this was the way things needed to be done and kaiako were in turn telling whānau. I would like to think that the removal of National Standards also removed that insistence of creating an "institution of normalisation" (Ball & Collet-Sabé, 2021, p. 3) but sadly I don't believe that at all.


References:


Backer, D. I. (2018). Interpellation, Counter-interpellation, and Education. Critical Education, 9(12), 1-21. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M6VD6P449 

Ball, S., & Collet-Sabé, J. (2021). Against school: an epistemological critique. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.1947780 

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Learning Media.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 - Identity

Week 11 - Mātauranga Māori and Indigenous Knowledge Systems

Week 12 - Assignment 2: Ka Mua Ka Muri